Search My Blog

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

NOVA | A Quantum Leap in Computing

A Quantum Leap in Computing

  • Posted 07.21.11
  • NOVA

Imagine a futuristic computer so powerful that it could quickly solve problems that even a supercomputer of today would need billions of years to grapple with. While it doesn’t exist yet, prototypes of such a magical machine are currently in operation at MIT, sorting out puzzles of quantum physics that no ordinary computer could handle. In this interview, MIT mechanical engineer Seth Lloyd, who helped establish the field of quantum computing, describes its revolutionary potential.

Seth Lloyd thinks that quantum computers similar to this one will not only have practical applications but also help solve mysteries of the utterly strange and super-small quantum realm. Enlarge Photo credit: © WGBH Educational Foundation

WEIRD LEMONADE

NOVA: Quantum mechanics has taught us that nature is pretty weird. Is it possible to take advantage of that?

Seth Lloyd: Quantum mechanics is weird, that's just the way it is. It's a sad thing, but it's true. In fact, there's a funny phenomenon where people who get their Nobel Prizes in quantum mechanics don't believe in quantum mechanics because it's so weird—starting with Einstein. Einstein got his Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect, all about quantum mechanics and photons, yet he never really believed in quantum mechanics.

Quantum mechanics is just completely strange and counterintuitive. We can't believe that things can be here [in one place] and there [in another place] at the same time. And yet that's a fundamental piece of quantum mechanics. So then the question is, life is dealing us weird lemons, can we make some weird lemonade from this?

Well, if you can have something that's here and there at the same time, then you can have a quantum bit [of information], or Q-bit as it's sometimes called, that can effectively register zero and one simultaneously. If you can do that, you can start processing information in some funky, quantum mechanical way, which nobody understands, that allows you to take advantage of this quantum weirdness.

Let's back up to some basics. How does a traditional computer store information?

Sure. A traditional digital computer like the one that I have on my desk operates by breaking down information into its smallest possible chunks. The smallest chunk of information is a bit. A bit is normally thought to be either zero or one. What a computer does is simply bust up the information into the smallest chunks and then flip them really, really, really rapidly in a systematic fashion.

Is that information—that zero or one—something physical, like a switch?

Yeah. The IBM physicist Rolf Landauer was fond of saying "information is physical." It's a slogan, but it really is true in the sense that whenever we process information, be it in a computer or in our brains, that information is represented by something. In your computer, if you have a bunch of electrons over here—we call that a zero—and a bunch of electrons over there—we call that a one. And if these electrons go from here to there, then zero is turning into one, the bit is flipping. An ordinary computer is simply doing that with many, many bits, billions of times a second.

How is a quantum computer different?

Think of miniaturizing a computer so that a bit is stored on an individual electron, so that a single electron over here is zero and a single electron over there is one. Now, an electron has this funny feature in quantum mechanics that it's really a wave, and this wave can be both here and there at the same time. And that means that the quantum bit that the electron represents registers both zero and one simultaneously. It also wiggles up and down a lot like a wave.

So how do you make those quantum bits into a computer?

Well, that's trickier! But nature supplies us with lots of electrons. And at bottom, nature is quantum mechanical, so all the things that we think of as particles like electrons have waves associated with them. If we can control them in a systematic fashion, then we can make a quantum computer.

The Q-bits at the heart of this quantum computer are superconducting circuits roughly the size of bacteria—far too tiny to see with the naked eye. Baffling our notions of what’s possible, these circuits can run both clockwise and counterclockwise simultaneously. Enlarge Photo credit: © WGBH Educational Foundation

CODEBREAKING: A "QILLER" APP

Why are quantum computers useful? Are they, in some sense, better than a standard computer?

Well, the first reason that quantum computers are useful is that they're just cool, let's face it! Like, so weird, like, whoa! Amazing, can that really happen? And the answer is "yes," because you can build quantum computers, and we've been building them for years now.

But the second reason is that if you have a different way, and a fundamentally weird way, of registering and processing information, then it means you can do computations in ways that our classical brains could not have dreamed of.

Now, actually, for many years, nobody could really figure out any problems that quantum computers could solve better than classical ones, and quantum computers were largely just a kind of a curiosity. They were known to be possible in theory. Then, about 15 years ago, I showed that they were possible in practice by proposing a way to build quantum computers. But nobody had a good application for them.

Then, in 1994, Peter Shore, who was then at AT&T and is now at MIT, came up with a killer app for quantum computers. (And maybe we should spell it Q-I-L-L-E-R because whenever you quantize something, you take a letter and turn it into a Q.) The Qiller app for quantum computers is breaking codes, codes like the ones we use whenever we use our bankcards.

How do these codes work?


Read More...
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/tech/quantum-computing.html

Tech & Engineering Resources

Text

 (43)
  • Artificial Intelligence Pioneer

    MIT’s Marvin Minsky, one of the fathers of AI, expounds on the current state of the field and hopes for its future.

  • Watson on Jeopardy!

    Three artificial-intelligence experts, including the leader of the Watson team, discuss the supercomputer’s prospects.

  • Smartest Machine: Expert Q&A

    The head of the AI team that programmed the computer "Watson" to compete on Jeopardy! answers questions.

  • Toward a Smart Electric Grid

    Should the U.S. be upgrading now to a "smart" electric grid? An energy expert insists there's no time to lose.

  • A Quantum Leap in Computing

    MIT’s Seth Lloyd, a pioneer of quantum computing, explains its applications and revolutionary potential.

Video

 (51)

Multimedia

 (45)
  • Inside a Nuclear Control Room

    Explore a panoramic image of the control room at the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station's training simulator.

  • Chemical Bonds Quiz

    Explore what holds atoms together to form the myriad chemical substances found in our world.

  • What's This Stuff?

    Think you know your stuff? Identify 10 mystery materials from a set of clues.

  • The Stuff of Smartphones

    See the materials and technologies that go into a smartphone as well as their environmental impact.

  • Putting Bacteria to Work

    Bacteria help us in all kinds of ways, from fermenting foods to aiding medicine, cleaning oil spills to mining minerals.

Audio

 (11)
  • Wireless Electricity?

    Using a new wireless charging system, plug-in electric cars may be able to shed their power cables entirely.

  • A Clean Energy Future?

    Developing clean energy technologies makes sense not only environmentally but economically, Nobelist Steven Chu argues.

  • Training for a Nuclear Crisis

    Are workers at U.S. nuclear power plants prepared to deal with earthquakes, tsunamis, and other disasters?

  • The Dangers of Nanotech

    Nanomaterials are used in consumer goods from cell phones to sunscreen. But how safe are they?

  • Rescuing the Miners

    Hear from Greg Hall, the drilling expert whose team reached 33 Chilean miners trapped more than 2,000 feet underground.

NOVA Education



No comments: